The Best Heart Rate Monitor Deals This Week*
*Deals are selected by our commerce team
Heart rate monitors (HRMs) can be immensely beneficial if you know how to use the information they collect. Exercise has dramatically different effects on the body depending on how high you push your heart rate and for how long. Training intelligently means using heart rate data to guide your workouts. Sometimes you might want to keep your heart rate relatively low to burn fat or pace yourself for a longer workout, but other times you might want to push it higher to build stamina. Another reason to own a HRM is to keep an eye on your resting heart rate with a device that can automatically record it for you.
There are many types and styles of monitors available, including those that come in some of our favorite fitness trackers and other health and fitness tech. This article looks at standalone HRMs, though many pair with a fitness tracker or a sports watch for convenience. We cover all the benefits of these separate monitors and list our favorites below. Make sure to read our buying guide at the end as well for some relevant shopping advice.
You Can Trust Our Reviews
Polar H9
Best for Beginners
Bottom Line:
The entry-level Polar H9 is the best heart rate monitor for anyone with basic needs, with a wide range of compatibility and an excellent companion app.
PROS
- Competitive price
- Accurate
- Supports ANT+, Bluetooth, and 5 kHz transmission (Gymlink)
- Easy to use
- Long battery life
- Comfortable
- Waterproof
CONS
- Lacks some features you get with pricier monitors
Wahoo Tickr X Heart Rate Monitor (Gen 2)
Best Value
Bottom Line:
Much more than a heart rate monitor, the Wahoo Tickr X doubles as a run tracker, works indoors and out, and even counts reps during strength training.
PROS
- Thinner, lighter, and better battery than its predecessor
- Records three advanced running metrics
- Offers ANT+ and Bluetooth support
- Can pair three Bluetooth devices at once
CONS
- Doesn’t record heart rate during swims
- App could have more engaging programs
Polar H10 Heart Rate Sensor
Best Phone-Free Monitoring
Bottom Line:
Versatile, comfortable, and highly accurate, the Polar H10 is one of the best heart rate monitors money can buy.
PROS
- Accurate readings in testing.
- Comfortable.
- Good battery life.
- Waterproof.
- Doesn’t require phone nearby.
CONS
- App charges for common features.
- GymLink connection occasionally lags.
Garmin HRM-DUAL
Best Battery Life
Bottom Line:
Garmin’s HRM-Dual chest strap heart rate monitor can connect to just about any device or app. It’s reliable, accurate, long-lasting, and comfortable, although it doesn’t include any special features.
PROS
- Accurate in testing.
- Long battery life.
- Uses ANT+ and Bluetooth.
- Comfortable.
- Machine-washable strap.
CONS
- Can’t connect directly to Garmin Connect app.
- No special features.
Peloton Heart Rate Band
Best for Peloton Users
Bottom Line:
The Peloton Heart Rate Band easily connects with the company’s equipment and app—as well as third-party machines and software—to accurately track your pulse and show your heart rate zone at a glance.
PROS
- Easily connects with Peloton machines and app
- Works with third-party equipment and software
- LEDs show your heart rate zone
- Comfortable
CONS
- No ANT+ support
- Strap is a little bulky
Polar OH1
Best HRM Armband
Bottom Line:
The Polar OH1 is an optical armband heart rate monitor rather than a chest strap, and is one of the better devices in the category.
PROS
- Convenient form factor
- Practically weightless
- Rechargeable battery
- Onboard memory
- Works with Strava
CONS
- Only reads heart rate
- Limited app connectivity
Scosche Rhythm24
Best for Biathlons and Triathlons
Bottom Line:
Scosche’s Rhythm24 armband heart rate monitor is a welcome alternative to chest straps, but be sure to set aside time to study the instructions.
PROS
- Comfortable.
- Color-coded heart rate zone light.
- Triathlon mode.
- Works with Bluetooth and ANT+ devices.
- Accurate.
CONS
- Lackluster mobile app.
- Difficult to operate.
- Requires another device or app to get the most out of it.
Wahoo Tickr FIT
Most Comfortable
Bottom Line:
Setting up and using the Wahoo Tickr Fit armband to measure heart rate during exercise couldn’t be easier, making it a top pick among heart rate monitors.
PROS
- Effortless setup.
- Rechargeable battery.
- Supports ANT+ and Bluetooth.
- Comfortable.
- Connects to a range of devices and apps.
CONS
- Can’t see heart rate or zones on sensor itself.
- Difficult to adjust while wearing.
Buying Guide: The Best Heart Rate Monitors for 2022
How Are Electric and Optical Heart Rate Monitors Different?
First, you need to decide between a classic chest strap, which uses an electrical pulse to read your heart rate, and something that uses optical technology. Many Fitbit devices, the Apple Watch, and other wrist-based activity trackers use the latter, as do sports headphones that record heart rate data via in-ear measurements.
Top to bottom: Peloton Heart Rate Band, Polar OH1
(Credit: Angela Moscaritolo)
Without getting too technical, chest straps read the small electrical signal your body creates to make your heart constrict. Optical technology sends light into the skin and reads the light that reflects back. Based on that information and what we know about how light scatters when it hits blood, these sensors translate the data into a pulse measurement. (Valencell, a company that makes HRMs and parts, has a detailed description of how optical heart rate sensors work(Opens in a new window).)
Electrical technology tends to be more accurate. Measurements from the arm and wrist are more difficult because those body parts can swing rapidly during activity, thus creating noisier data. In-ear optical HRMs tend to be better than wrist-based ones because the ear doesn’t move nearly as much. The skin of the ear works better for optical readings than the skin on the arm, as well.
Are Heart Rate Monitors Accurate?
Now that you know a little about how different HRMs work and why some are more accurate than others, it’s important to address the issue of how much accuracy matters. There are generally two reasons consumers (i.e., not medical professionals or elite athletes) want to know their heart rate data: to know their resting heart rate and to use heart rate data for exercise and training.
Resting heart rate is easy. You can read it by feeling your pulse with two fingers and counting it. You can also read it using a free app and a smartphone camera(Opens in a new window). It’s easy to read resting heart rate with or without a device, as well as compare data across methods.
More importantly, ask your doctor whether they care if your resting heart rate is, say, 58 versus 60. The answer is probably no. It’s more important to know whether your resting heart rate is within a healthy range. If your heart rate is 80 when it should be closer to 60, that’s a potential concern. The point is that a fine degree of accuracy isn’t important for most consumers.
Similarly, when people use their heart rate for training and exercise, the exact number of beats per minute matters less than the heart rate zone. Many fitness apps and smart home gym machines that pair with HRMs either estimate or calibrate custom heart rate zones for you, and show them on a graph with the zones blocked out in different colors. The point, again, is that knowing the exact number of beats per minute isn’t as important as knowing the reading falls within a general range.
There is one more use of heart rate data, and here, accuracy does matter more, but it’s a different kind of accuracy. Heart rate recovery, or how quickly your heart rate decreases after intense activity, is a great measurement of one’s health and fitness. In our testing, chest straps are much more accurate than optical heart monitors for this kind of reading. Optical monitors tend to lag slightly when it comes to detecting rapid heart rate change. Is it enough of a difference to matter to the typical consumer? Probably not. But if you use heart rate seriously for fitness, you might care more about this issue.
Polar H9
(Credit: Polar)
Are ANT+ or Bluetooth Heart Rate Monitors Better?
Many HRMs use ANT+, a wireless technology that’s been around since before Bluetooth became popular and is common in a lot of other sports equipment, from bicycle cadence meters to treadmills. Phones don’t typically support ANT+, however. So, when you want to pair an ANT+ device to a phone and app, you often need an adapter. Heart rate monitors that use Bluetooth are much easier to pair directly with your phone. The most versatile trackers support both ANT+ and Bluetooth connectivity.
Recommended by Our Editors
Should You Choose an Arm Band or a Chest Strap Heart Rate Monitor?
In terms of comfort, chest straps will never get a thumbs up across the board. Chest straps wrap snugly around the chest at the sternum, and if they’re not tight enough, they can slide down or wiggle out of place. Repositioning them while you’re in motion is tough. A bad one can chafe your skin, and they’re poor at providing visual feedback because you can’t see them.
We tend to prefer arm bands over chest straps. They’re much easier to wear, you can adjust them quickly even while you’re in motion, and they don’t cause chafing. They also have LEDs that flash different colors depending on your heart rate zone. That’s the kind of visual feedback you can’t get from a chest strap alone. Usually, with chest straps, you have to rely on a connected tracker to see your heart rate numbers.
Wahoo Tickr X
(Credit: Wahoo)
Double-Duty HRMs
Earlier, we mentioned in-ear optical HRMs. They’re neat because they’re built into sports headphones, so you essentially get two devices for the price of one. While these devices cost a lot more than other HRMs, they’re a good value if you’re also in the market for a new pair of wireless sports headphones.
And let’s not forget fitness trackers. In addition to a heart rate monitor, the Apple Watch Series 8 has a sensor that functions as an electrocardiogram (ECG) and generates a PDF of your heart rhythm that you can share with your doctor. The FDA even cleared this use case.
Hits: 0
