A study has found that drivers can perform simple tasks quicker with buttons, knobs, and other physical controls instead of smartphone-inspired systems that rely on touchscreens.
Swedish car magazine Vi Bilägare(Opens in a new window) had drivers perform four actions—reset the trip odometer; “activate the heated seat, increase temperature by two degrees, and start the defroster”; turn on the radio and tune it to a specific channel; and “lower the instrument lighting to the lowest level and turn off the center display”—on 12 cars while the vehicle was moving at 68 mph (110 km/h).
The magazine says 11 of those cars featured touchscreen-based control systems; one was equipped with more traditional controls. (Drivers were able to familiarize themselves with each system before the experiment, Vi Bilägare says, to make the comparison more fair.) Each system’s performance was then judged based on how long it took drivers to complete the specified tasks.
Vi Bilägare says drivers performed the best with more traditional controls, and for the most part, it wasn’t even close. Drivers were able to complete all four tasks in 10 seconds flat with the Volvo V70’s physical controls. Only the Dacia Sandero (13.5s), Volvo C40 (13.7), and Subaru Outback (19.4s) came within 10 seconds of the V70. The others came in between 20.2 and 44.9 seconds.
That means the vehicles traveled as far as 0.85 miles before drivers completed all four tasks.
(Vi Bilägare)
These findings don’t measure other problems with touchscreen-based controls. Vi Bilägare notes that some of the systems don’t feature backlighting for certain functions, such as climate controls, which makes them difficult to use at night. Others rely on large screens that force drivers to look further away from the road than systems that rely on physical buttons (or smaller touchscreens).
Recommended by Our Editors
One issue that Vi Bilägare doesn’t note: touchscreen-based controls can be changed at any time. Tesla modified the controls(Opens in a new window) for the Model 3 with a software update in January, for example, and other manufacturers could do the same. That means drivers accustomed to finding controls in specific places can suddenly find themselves having to navigate an unfamiliar system.
Touchscreens can offer advantages when it comes to personalization, enabling more granular settings, etc. But this study shows that when it comes to making sure drivers can devote as much attention to the road as possible, we might be better off with hardware-based controls than software-based ones.
Get Our Best Stories!
Sign up for What’s New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning.
This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.
Hits: 0