Alright, curling fans, buckle up because the 2026 Winter Olympics are already serving up some high-stakes drama on the ice, and we’re only a few days in. We’re talking about the kind of controversy that has teams, coaches, and even the World Curling Federation scrambling to adjust protocols mid-tournament. The core of the issue? The dreaded ‘double-touch’ rule and the subsequent **umpiring** setup that’s been causing some serious headaches.
For those not deep into the nuanced world of curling, the ‘double-touch’ rule is pretty straight up: once a stone crosses the hog line, a player cannot make contact with it again. Period. The hog line, a red line 21 feet from each hack, is super important for defining the delivery zone. Touching the stone after this point is a no-go, resulting in the stone being removed from play. This rule is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the game, ensuring stones aren’t manipulated post-delivery to gain an unfair advantage in speed or direction. It’s a core tenet of sportsmanship in a sport often lauded for its ‘Spirit of Curling’ – fair play, honest competition, and respect for opponents.
We saw this rule bite both Canada’s women’s team, led by skipper Rachel Homan, and Great Britain’s men’s club, with Bobby Lammie, on Day 8 of the Games. Stones were pulled, and players looked legit shocked, dude. Homan’s first stone against Switzerland was controversially removed, sparking questions about why video review wasn’t an option. Then Lammie’s stone faced the same fate against Germany. Talk about a tough break for two powerhouse nations in the sport.
The quick succession of these incidents clearly lit a fire under World Curling. Initially, they had a setup where two umpires would rotate between four sheets, focusing on deliveries approaching the hog line. But after Sunday’s play and those back-to-back incidents, they changed their tune faster than you can say ‘sweep!’ The new protocol? Umpires will *only* monitor deliveries upon a team’s request. Otherwise, they’ll be available, but not actively ruling on these plays, citing the logistical challenge of having an official at all four hog lines simultaneously. It’s almost like they’re saying, ‘My bad, we tried, but this is harder than it looks.’
This whole situation escalated with Canada’s men’s team also getting embroiled. Marc Kennedy found himself in a heated exchange with Sweden’s Oskar Eriksson over a similar alleged double-touch. Kennedy’s colorful response made headlines, but without an umpire ruling on the play, no stone was removed. Adding another layer to this onion, Canadian coach Paul Webster straight-up accused Sweden of positioning staff and fans to film opponents’ releases at the hog lines – a move Sweden denied. While Canada isn’t pursuing formal sanctions, it just goes to show how high the tensions are when Olympic medals are on the line.
The big question swirling now is: what’s the long-term fix? Many are eyeing video review as the solution, a tool that’s become commonplace in so many other major sports, from the NFL’s instant replay to soccer’s VAR. However, not everyone’s on board. Sweden’s Johanna Heldin expressed concerns to the Associated Press, worried that video reviews could disrupt the pace of play. She hopes the ‘Spirit of Curling’ can prevail, emphasizing the sport’s tradition of high sportsmanship.
But Team USA’s Tara and Tabitha Peterson are highkey on board with video reviews, pointing out that if other sports can do it, why can’t curling? And for real, it’s a valid point. In an era where precision and fairness are paramount, relying solely on human eyes for split-second decisions in a high-pressure environment feels a little… old school, no cap. The logistical challenges are real – you’d need cameras on every hog line, officials dedicated to reviewing footage, and a system to integrate it seamlessly without slowing down the game too much.
Curling, while steeped in tradition and gentlemanly conduct, is also an elite Olympic sport. The stakes are immense, and athletes train for years for these moments. To have a game-changing call made (or missed) due to a lack of proper officiating technology or protocols feels like a disservice to their dedication. Maybe it’s time for World Curling to take a page out of the big league playbooks and invest in some dope tech for future games, ensuring every call is as on-point as the players’ throws.
If you enjoyed this article, share it with your friends or leave us a comment!
